Compare Tools

Your linter checks syntax.
Who checks architecture?

ESLint, Biome, Ruff, and pyright are essential — but they only see one file at a time. Archgate adds the governance layer that enforces cross-file conventions, architectural boundaries, and team decisions.

Three layers, one goal

Linters enforce code style. Type checkers enforce correctness. Archgate enforces architecture. They're complementary — use all three.

Linters

ESLint, Biome, oxlint, Ruff, golangci-lint — catch syntax errors, enforce code style, flag unused variables. Per-file, per-language, deterministic. Essential, but scoped to what a single file can tell you.

Type & Compile Checkers

pyright, tsc, cargo check, go vet — validate type correctness and catch compile-time errors. Language-specific, deeply integrated with the compiler. Irreplaceable for type safety.

Archgate

Architecture governance that works above linting. Enforces cross-file conventions, architectural boundaries, and team decisions — then teaches AI agents to follow them from the start.

Archgate doesn't replace your linter — it orchestrates linting as one enforcement mechanism among many. Your ESLint, Biome, or Ruff config keeps working exactly as before.

What each tool actually checks

Linters and type checkers handle the bottom of the stack. Archgate handles the top — where architecture, conventions, and AI alignment live.

Code style & formatting
Linters
Type Checkers
Archgate
Delegates to existing tools
Unused variables & imports
Linters
Type Checkers
Partial support
Archgate
Delegates to existing tools
Type safety
Linters
Type Checkers
Archgate
Delegates to existing tools
File & folder structure
Linters
Type Checkers
Archgate
Architecture boundaries
Linters
Type Checkers
Archgate
Cross-file conventions
Linters
Type Checkers
Archgate
Naming conventions (semantic)
Linters
Partial support
Type Checkers
Archgate
AI agent alignment
Linters
Type Checkers
Archgate
Self-improving rules
Linters
Type Checkers
Archgate
Decision documentation
Linters
Type Checkers
Archgate
Language-agnostic
Linters
Type Checkers
Archgate
Supported
Partial support
Delegates to existing tools
Not supported

Why agents burn tokens without governance

Without structured architecture rules, AI agents spend most of their context window discovering your conventions through trial and error. Archgate gives them the answer upfront.

Agent without Archgate

1 Grep ( "component pattern" ) ~800
2 Glob ( "src/**/*.astro" ) ~600
3 Read ( Header.astro ) ~1,200
4 Read ( Hero.astro ) ~1,000
5 Read ( Features.astro ) ~1,000
6 Grep ( "naming convention" ) ~800
7 Read ( Button.astro, Badge.astro ) ~1,400
8 Read ( global.css ) ~800
9 Agent ( explore codebase patterns ) ~2,400
10 Write ( NewSection.astro ) ~2,000
Total tokens ~12,000

Agent with Archgate

1 MCP ( review_context() ) ~1,500
2 Write ( NewSection.astro ) ~2,000
3 MCP ( check(--staged) ) ~500
Total tokens ~4,000
~67% fewer tokens per task
Fewer tool calls

Agents skip the discovery phase — no grep, no find, no guessing at conventions from file examples.

Higher accuracy

Rules are explicit, not inferred. Agents produce conforming code on the first try instead of iterating.

Consistent results

Every agent — Claude, Cursor, Copilot — reads the same ADRs and follows the same rules.

67%
Fewer tokens per task

Agents skip the discovery phase when ADRs provide structured rules upfront

3 steps
Instead of 10

Read ADRs, write code, run check — no grepping, no guessing, no iterating

Any language
One governance layer

Archgate works across your entire stack — not one config per language

Add the missing layer to your stack

Keep your linters. Keep your type checkers. Add Archgate for the architecture governance they can't provide.